A fork of Rural Dictionary
A person whose; 1 direct flagrant furthering of normalizations of irresponsible choices,
or 2, deliberate lowering of values AROUND something where responsibility could-be lowered;
Is a part of a temporary or long-term group behavior or claimed demonstrative-positions amidst a wider debate or issue in society, but either way, their actions LEAD TO irresponsible behavior or the lowering of-levels-of responsibility, WITHOUT DIRECTLY ADVOCATING, the irresponsible behavior.
The maintenance of the position that causes this is an establishMENT of a maintained-position, hence the hybrid? err,.. tense-relative suffix ;
a -tant,
of a -ment.
It is this indirect causation, that makes the word a INCLUSIVE-noun term, it's not just an adjective prone to ambiguity or flexible meaning.
-ity/-tant/similar conjugations, infers irresponsibility-risk-causation AMONGST, their actions, character, or other personal things, or of a group, of the group's. The how or why, can be nearby the word itself, they do not need to be specified in the same sentence.
The -tant suffix denotes distinctly, that it is in the context of REPETITION, not something new, that is being defended or advocated. It can be evocative of PAST-irresponsibility, while being then adjectivally applied TO a person-noun, position, social-construct, etc - SEE example 2
One could find irresponsibilitants amongst both republicans as well as democrats within U.S. Politics and their statements, but people might still disagree on how much and-WHEN the two sides lower-values or risk harmful behavior, when their statements and positions don't seem to be going to cover-everyone, affect those outside the USA but not those within it, or other omitted inevitabilities that send mixed messages if you mention them at the same time.
If both at least did not pretend as though they're going to cover or care for everyone, then at least they'd be being honest about what they claim to be going to do, but regardless, their KNOWING, irresponsibilital-concessions to whoever writes their speeches, suggests neither can say-no to rhetoric if it might give them an edge in the election.
---
example 2 - The belligerent, backward priest, refused to acknowledge the cultural damage his predecessors had caused on the claimant in court, but the judge made a decision for the claimant regardless, condemning the priest in their closing speech for trying to societally-normalize irresponSIBILITY while not appearing to be an irresponsiBILITANT at the same time, while having deceitfully and knowingly maintained one false-presentation to their donators, and another, to the supposed recipients of their at that time, assumed-genuine generosity.
A blustering, over-confident person, whose insistence that the INTERPRETIVE assumptions made since speculation about inferred-assumable doppler-shift like indications of the age of the universe, is as well proven, as other science, in-substantia of EXCLUSIARY standards, i.e. this... cannot be ANYthing else,.. of which science demands before one can claim to know something absolutely,.. whose blow-ING ... or pushing,.. bible-bashing,.. etc ... makes them 'A' blowhole ... for either the specific theory,.. or irresponsible conduct / sloppy science in general,
Whome is also, YET to have stopped, future-tense verb... blowING.
It can be combined with source indirect references, also - see example
Prof ambiguousPratt over in astrophysics, is such a massive Big-Bang Blowhole,.. i heard her going on about how that new grant is certain not to be a waste for the uni,.. but get this,.. she avoided 4 times! while i was evesdropping on her making her telephone call, whether or not we would be getting much from it ... in other words, yes, but technically, if it leads to other improvements in other things,.. not necessarily the results being aimed for,.. for the experiment in question. Who's not heard of that one before? Oh yeah maybe we'll get something valuable as a by-product somewhere down the line,.. i'm sure ... so nevermind whether or not ... MY ... experiment ... is going to be worth it for what's being aimed for just-within it. What a Big-Bang Blowhole, gosh i'm sick of her, every time there's reasonable scrutiny into efficiency, she doesn't shut up for weeks, phone constantly going around the corner, GOES OFF, for weeks on end, yeah i know, i know...
(or Clive-Palmerate without the hyphen)
A of Australian origin, although might have traveled to some extent,
fictional down-to-earth dead-end-reality like (when applied) 'lubricant' in-mockery-of , rather than mythical aggrandization of 19th/20th century magical-cure oils, aethers/vapors, etc,
in reference to the simultaneous size of Clive Palmer's war-chest so to speak, spending-on-lawyers readiness or supposed 'untouchability' ... when despite his wealth, he loses most court-cases he's involved in,
and in-usage therefore,
INSTEAD of being an actual lubrical, (social, political),
it at-best? means bribery, or decisions made with incentives, but bribery basically,
( while setting aside the immorality of bribery, but as a inferred fast-tracking or sometimes waste-evading method )
or primarily,
means adding something that is SUPPOSED to be going-to facilitate social/political lubrication,
but draws attention to itself, might attract the interest of the police, courts, or other interventionaries, the media, or generally cause a already slow or clogged, dirty machine-of-industry or of-politics, to become EVEN MORE, slowed down or even more clogged, despite the irony of it's (on the label) purpose.
If i remember correctly, it has also been used as an INGREDIENT, amongst the ingredients list on the back of a fictional political-product (a metaphoric consumer product message-in-a-bottle (or item))
This local state election, contains;
20% continued climate change disaster relief grant spending money,
5% income tax, 0% corporations tax,
25% party-political donations and federal-party indirect unaccounted-for support,
50% Clive-Palmer-ate
Gee, that episode of Insiders on TV last night was something-else, eh? Reckon it was running on 100% Clive-Palmerate, that one!